Peter Andrews obstruction of justice trial

No ruling today, by the way. Lawyers can still submit case law in writing, check Day 1 translation transcript. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:23:54 PM

Hurley: "It's speculation that got is into this courtroom. I would hope the decision is not going to rest on speculation as well." #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:22:35 PM

Hurley rebuts: Crown's assertions are mostly speculation. Why not call Olscamp, others in that meeting, as witnesses to prove it? #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:20:25 PM

Crown wraps. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:18:44 PM

Judge: what would Andrews motive be in helping Robichaud? Crown: we don't have to prove motive. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:18:35 PM

Crown: why so important in this partic. case that charges should not be laid & brand new approach tried, if not that it was Robichaud. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:15:50 PM

Judge now questions Andrews' logic that fines weren't high enough to deter, noting dept can increase fines, seek maximum. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:13:32 PM

Crown says illogical that pulling licence made sense. Would close Robichaud operation -- not exactly stated goal of helping development. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:12:20 PM

Judge asks if Crown is attacking credibility of Andrews. "In a way, yes I am." Says Andrews' story doesn't add up. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:10:56 PM

Given Andrews re-checked decision with DM morning of Nov. 23, "isn't it more likely" decision made by Olscamp-Robichaud night before? #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:09:41 PM

Crown asks rhetorically if identity of Donat Robichaud's brother played a role in decision. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:08:00 PM

Crown: we have to ask: was decision really taken at that Nov 22 morning meeting? "What really happened" at that meeting? #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:06:59 PM

Crown says due to 6-month limit on charges, decision to try pulling licence amounts to no charge being laid. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:05:41 PM

Crown: dept's own enforcement policy allows charges "without warning" if dept warnings ignored, if public danger. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:03:43 PM

Once file ready, it's up to Crown to decide on charges, not senior bureaucrats. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 6:00:54 PM

Crown: it's undisputed that Donat Robichaud "mostly non-compliant" and that dept tried repeatedly & in vain to get him to comply. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:55:25 PM

Dept had "tried everything" and had threatened Robichaud repeatedly. He had no reason to believe yet more threats (on pulling licence). #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:54:05 PM

Crown: we don't dispute that Andrews took direction from Deputy Minister Dupuis. But Andrews took part in & agreed with decision. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:50:34 PM

Crown: Robichaud's equipment outside his lease area was "dangerous" to public and risked civil liability. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:49:15 PM

In case like Donat Robichaud, who was "mostly non-compliant," there was "only one option" -- to charge him. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:47:02 PM

Crown: we disagree that Germain was wrong to lay charge. "Mr. Germain was right" to see interference from higher-ups. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:45:31 PM

Crown prosecutor Mona Briere will now make her closing argument. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:34:42 PM

"Mr. Andrews' name was rarely mentioned throughout this entire trial." #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:22:48 PM

Hurley: throughout trial, we heard about Paul Robichaud, Donat Robichaud, DM Dupuis. "Who's on trial here?" #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:22:09 PM

Judge Dickson comment: "Every witness was credible." Everyone believed they were acting properly. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:19:28 PM

Hurley: we are here because of 2012 anonymous letter that made allegation. (Letter sent to Liberals & raised by them in Legislature.) #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:18:30 PM

Hurley: "There is no offence here, quite frankly." #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:17:04 PM

"Mr Andrews did it to get the information he needed to report to his deputy minister, and there's nothing wrong with that." -Hurley #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:16:13 PM

Dec 12 query by Sabine on if charges, laid by then, can be withdrawn: Andrews asked for that "because he was doing his job." #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:12:24 PM

In Hurley narrative, this whole thing goes back to Sabine wrongly seeing political motive. "Then all hell broke loose," judge observes. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:07:45 PM

Hurley: both Germain & Veniot took from Sabine's erroneous email that this was political, & that prompted decision to charge regardless. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:05:58 PM

Hurley reminds court Andrews didn't know about Sabine's inaccurate email until affair became public in April 2012. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:04:35 PM

Hurley: Sabine acknowledged he "surmised" when he suggested in email that decision on no charges came out of Olscamp-Robichaud meeting. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:03:28 PM

"Anyone who suggests anything that took place at that meeting is engaging in pure, unadulterated speculation and nothing more." -Hurley. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:02:07 PM

"Anyone who suggest anything that took place at that meeting is engaging in pure, unadulterated speculation and nothing more." - Hurley. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:01:27 PM

Hurley notes no evidence called, Olscamp and Robichaud not called as witnesses, as to what happened at their meeting. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 5:00:18 PM

Hurley: timeline also shows Nov 22 decision came prior to any meeting between Ministers Olscamp and Robichaud. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:58:35 PM

Hurley: registrar Lori O'Brien testified she looked into legality of pulling licence same afternoon. Consistent with Andrews evidence. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:56:57 PM

At that meeting it was raised, unexpectedly & not by Olscamp, to look at pulling licence instead of laying charge. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:55:14 PM

Judge Dickson notes Andrews evidence "uncontradicted" that key Nov 22 meeting held not on this case but to brief Olscamp on gen issues. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:52:45 PM

Hurley: "courtesy" notification of Robichaud by Olscamp was so that Robichaud would not be "taken off guard." #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:47:17 PM

Hurley: DM told Andrews Olscamp might want to tell Paul Robichaud "as a courtesy" that his brother to be charged. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:46:20 PM

Defence lawyer Hurley: Andrews "was directed by his superior ... as part of his duties" to hold off on charges til Olscamp briefed. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:45:11 PM

Judge Dickson asking Hurley questions during his closing about exact nature of Donat Robichaud violations. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:40:55 PM

Hurley: evidence shows dept studied system of fines without trial. Shows dept's preference for avoiding court. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:34:24 PM

Hurley: "I submit Mr Germain was wrong" to lay charge despite directive from head of enforcement Sabine. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:28:08 PM

Defence lawyer Hurley: 2011 same as 2008, when charges didn't proceed. Only difference: in 2011 officer laid charge regardless. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:27:05 PM

Hurley: Donat Robichaud was in and out of compliance for years, but was in compliance at some times. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:24:29 PM

Hurley: Andrews received direction and instructions from his deputy minister, and understood dept wanted to work with producers. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:21:59 PM

Defence: clear from policy document that dept sought to work with producers, with court charges "a last resort." No one disputed this. #NB

by Jacques Poitras via twitter 3/13/2014 4:19:59 PM

Accessibility Links

CBC Global Navigation

CBC News Canada

Major StoriesIn The News

In the news

CBC News Navigation

Peter Andrews obstruction of justice trial

Latest Interactives

CBC Global Footer

CBC.ca

Corporate

Stay Connected

CBC Links